Skip to content

Knowing an eigenstate’s energy does not tell us how strongly an operator connects it to another state. That strength depends on normalized vectors and their matrix element. Here a regular five-site Bethe state gives an exact example: four nonzero momentum transfers have equal strength, while the zero-momentum transition vanishes. You will derive the state, calculate the amplitudes, and check their sum against a local spin identity. Everything takes place in a finite periodic chain.

Required background. Construct Bethe vectors algebraically supplies the regular creation-block state and its monodromy convention. You need complex inner products, orthonormal spin configurations and spin-raising operators. Helpful background. The linear-algebra bridge reviews normalization and complete bases; one-magnon waves explains the Fourier eigenstates used below.

Use the spin-1/21/2 XXX ring with N=5N=5, J>0J\gt0, ℏ=1\hbar=1, unit lattice spacing and

H=J2∑x=15(I−Px,x+1),6≡1.H=\frac J2\sum_{x=1}^{5}(I-P_{x,x+1}),\qquad 6\equiv1.

Here Sxa=σxa/2S_x^a=\sigma_x^a/2, Sx±=Sxx±iSxyS_x^\pm=S_x^x\pm iS_x^y, and PP exchanges two spins. In the orthonormal configuration basis,

∣x⟩=Sx−∣0⟩,∣x,y⟩=Sx−Sy−∣0⟩(x<y),|x\rangle=S_x^-|0\rangle,\qquad |x,y\rangle=S_x^-S_y^-|0\rangle\quad(x\lt y),

where ∣0⟩|0\rangle is all up. The active right translation sends each site to its successor: U∣x⟩=∣x+1⟩U|x\rangle=|x+1\rangle, with cyclic labels.

Keep the creation block B(v)B(v) of

Ta(v)=La5(v)⋯La1(v),Lax(v)=(v−i/2)I+iPax.T_a(v)=L_{a5}(v)\cdots L_{a1}(v),\qquad L_{ax}(v)=(v-i/2)I+iP_{ax}.

The regular two-root exercise establishes that

∣Φ⟩=B(1/2)B(−1/2)∣0⟩|\Phi\rangle=B(1/2)B(-1/2)|0\rangle

is a nonzero eigenvector. These are creation parameters λB\lambda_B; the coordinate convention has λcoord=−λB\lambda_{\rm coord}=-\lambda_B. The set {1/2,−1/2}\{1/2,-1/2\} is unchanged by that sign reversal, so this particular root set cannot diagnose a momentum-convention error by itself.

Entry check: a vector is not yet normalized

Section titled “Entry check: a vector is not yet normalized”

Suppose an operator calculation produces ⟨f∣O∣Φ⟩\langle f|O|\Phi\rangle, where ∣f⟩|f\rangle is normalized but the norm of ∣Φ⟩|\Phi\rangle has not been calculated. Can its squared modulus already be used as the normalized transition strength? Would knowing its energy settle the question?

Check and repair

No. Calculate ∥Φ∥\|\Phi\| and divide the amplitude by it, or divide the squared modulus by ∥Φ∥2\|\Phi\|^2. An eigenvalue equation cannot detect this missing factor: rescaling an eigenvector leaves its energy unchanged. Review inner products and normalization if this distinction is unfamiliar.

For any nonzero raw initial and final vectors, the normalized matrix element is

Mfi=⟨Φf∣O∣Φi⟩∥Φf∥ ∥Φi∥.M_{fi}=\frac{\langle\Phi_f|O|\Phi_i\rangle} {\|\Phi_f\|\,\|\Phi_i\|}.

Replacing normalized states by eiαi∣Ψi⟩e^{i\alpha_i}|\Psi_i\rangle and eiαf∣Ψf⟩e^{i\alpha_f}|\Psi_f\rangle multiplies MfiM_{fi} by ei(αi−αf)e^{i(\alpha_i-\alpha_f)}. Its weight ∣Mfi∣2|M_{fi}|^2 is unchanged. A matrix element retains phase information; a weight does not.

Separate the ten unordered pairs into the five cyclic neighbors and the other five pairs:

A={12,23,34,45,15},D={13,14,24,25,35}.\begin{aligned} \mathcal A&=\{12,23,34,45,15\},\\ \mathcal D&=\{13,14,24,25,35\}. \end{aligned}

The exact vector is

∣Φ⟩=18(∑xy∈D∣x,y⟩−∑xy∈A∣x,y⟩).|\Phi\rangle=\frac18\left( \sum_{xy\in\mathcal D}|x,y\rangle -\sum_{xy\in\mathcal A}|x,y\rangle\right).

In particular, sites 11 and 55 are adjacent. Treating them as endpoints of an open chain would change the vector’s interpretation and its Hamiltonian check.

Derive the raw amplitudes from the creation block

The one-block formula is

B(w)∣0⟩=i∑x=15(w+i/2)5−x(w−i/2)x−1∣x⟩.B(w)|0\rangle =i\sum_{x=1}^{5}(w+i/2)^{5-x}(w-i/2)^{x-1}|x\rangle.

At w=−1/2w=-1/2, the coefficients in site order 1,…,51,\ldots,5 are

14(−i, 1, i, −1, −i).\frac14(-i,\ 1,\ i,\ -1,\ -i).

Multiplying the local blocks for B(1/2)B(1/2) gives these entries:

Input site xxCoefficient in B(−1/2)∣0⟩B(-1/2)\lvert0\rangle⟨1,2∣B(1/2)∣x⟩\langle1,2\rvert B(1/2)\lvert x\rangle⟨1,3∣B(1/2)∣x⟩\langle1,3\rvert B(1/2)\lvert x\rangle
11−i/4-i/4−i/4-i/4−1/4-1/4
221/41/4−1/4-1/41/21/2
33i/4i/400−1/4-1/4

The columns for either target vanish on inputs 4,54,5. To see the sign of the less immediate 1/21/2 entry, put α=(1+i)/2\alpha=(1+i)/2. An input down spin at site 22 becomes the pair 1,31,3 through three auxiliary spin exchanges. Their factor is i3i^3, followed by two diagonal factors α\alpha, giving i3α2=1/2i^3\alpha^2=1/2.

Taking the indicated products gives

⟨1,2∣Φ⟩=(−i4)2−116=−18,⟨1,3∣Φ⟩=i16+18−i16=18.\begin{aligned} \langle1,2|\Phi\rangle &=\left(-\frac i4\right)^2-\frac1{16} =-\frac18,\\ \langle1,3|\Phi\rangle &=\frac i{16}+\frac18-\frac i{16} =\frac18. \end{aligned}

The regular Bethe calculation gives U∣Φ⟩=∣Φ⟩U|\Phi\rangle=|\Phi\rangle. The translation orbits of 1212 and 1313 exhaust the ten configurations, so these two components determine the whole vector. The displayed vector also verifies that translation property directly.

The configuration states are orthonormal, hence

⟨Φ∣Φ⟩=1064=532,∥Φ∥=108.\langle\Phi|\Phi\rangle=\frac{10}{64}=\frac5{32}, \qquad \|\Phi\|=\frac{\sqrt{10}}8.

We choose the normalized state

∣Ψ⟩=∣Φ⟩∥Φ∥=110(∑D∣x,y⟩−∑A∣x,y⟩).|\Psi\rangle=\frac{|\Phi\rangle}{\|\Phi\|} =\frac1{\sqrt{10}}\left( \sum_{\mathcal D}|x,y\rangle-\sum_{\mathcal A}|x,y\rangle\right).

This fixes a global phase by making every adjacent-pair amplitude negative real. Other phase choices describe the same physical state.

There is a short Hamiltonian check independent of rapidity formulas. Write ∣A⟩=∑A∣x,y⟩|A\rangle=\sum_{\mathcal A}|x,y\rangle and ∣D⟩=∑D∣x,y⟩|D\rangle=\sum_{\mathcal D}|x,y\rangle. Each adjacent configuration has two unequal bonds; each nonadjacent configuration has four. Applying the bond exchanges and collecting equal configurations gives

H∣A⟩=J(∣A⟩−∣D⟩),H∣D⟩=J(∣D⟩−∣A⟩).H|A\rangle=J(|A\rangle-|D\rangle),\qquad H|D\rangle=J(|D\rangle-|A\rangle).

Therefore

H∣Ψ⟩=2J∣Ψ⟩,U∣Ψ⟩=∣Ψ⟩.H|\Psi\rangle=2J|\Psi\rangle,\qquad U|\Psi\rangle=|\Psi\rangle.

The state has coordinate momentum Ki=0K_i=0 modulo 2π2\pi and total spin component Stotz=5/2−2=1/2S^z_{\rm tot}=5/2-2=1/2.

For the five allowed momenta, define

qm=2πm5,Oq+=15∑x=15e−iqxSx+,m=0,…,4.q_m=\frac{2\pi m}{5},\qquad O_q^+=\frac1{\sqrt5}\sum_{x=1}^{5}e^{-iqx}S_x^+, \qquad m=0,\ldots,4.

Our spin operators and their matrix elements are dimensionless with ℏ=1\hbar=1. The Fourier factor 1/51/\sqrt5 is part of the operator definition; changing it changes every weight.

Since [Stotz,Oq+]=Oq+[S^z_{\rm tot},O_q^+]=O_q^+, this operator turns the two-down-spin state into the one-down-spin sector. A normalized basis of that final sector is

∣k⟩=15∑y=15eiky∣y⟩,k=2πℓ5,ℓ=0,…,4.|k\rangle=\frac1{\sqrt5}\sum_{y=1}^{5}e^{iky}|y\rangle, \qquad k=\frac{2\pi\ell}{5},\quad \ell=0,\ldots,4.

The positive exponent in the state and the negative exponent in the operator are deliberate. Active translation gives

U∣k⟩=e−ik∣k⟩,USx+U−1=Sx+1+.U|k\rangle=e^{-ik}|k\rangle, \qquad US_x^+U^{-1}=S_{x+1}^+.

Relabeling the finite sum, with e5iq=1e^{5iq}=1 at the seam, yields

UOq+U−1=eiqOq+.UO_q^+U^{-1}=e^{iq}O_q^+.

Thus an initial state with UU eigenvalue e−iKie^{-iK_i} can have a nonzero matrix element only to a state with

Kf=Ki−q(mod2π).K_f=K_i-q\pmod{2\pi}.

Here Ki=0K_i=0, so the only possible final Fourier state is ∣−q⟩|-q\rangle. This is a necessary selection rule. It does not guarantee a nonzero amplitude.

After a raising operator removes one down spin, the remaining down spin can be at any site yy. The removed spin was at either y±1y\pm1 or y±2y\pm2. The former pairs have negative amplitudes; the latter have positive amplitudes. Consequently,

⟨y∣Oq+∣Ψ⟩=150[−e−iq(y−1)−e−iq(y+1)+e−iq(y−2)+e−iq(y+2)]=2[cos⁡(2q)−cos⁡q]50e−iqy.\begin{aligned} \langle y|O_q^+|\Psi\rangle &=\frac1{\sqrt{50}}\bigl[ -e^{-iq(y-1)}-e^{-iq(y+1)}\\ &\hspace{4.8em}+e^{-iq(y-2)}+e^{-iq(y+2)}\bigr]\\ &=\frac{2[\cos(2q)-\cos q]}{\sqrt{50}}e^{-iqy}. \end{aligned}

Cyclic site labels are legitimate because qq is an allowed ring momentum. Comparing with the normalized Fourier vector gives the entire output:

Oq+∣Ψ⟩=Mq∣−q⟩,Mq=2[cos⁡(2q)−cos⁡q]10.O_q^+|\Psi\rangle=M_q|-q\rangle,\qquad M_q=\frac{2[\cos(2q)-\cos q]}{\sqrt{10}}.

The fixed state phases make these amplitudes real:

Momentum label mmMqmM_{q_m}Weight ∣Mqm∣2\lvert M_{q_m}\rvert^2
000000
1,41,4−1/2-1/\sqrt21/21/2
2,32,31/21/\sqrt21/21/2

For example, cos⁡(2π/5)=(5−1)/4\cos(2\pi/5)=(\sqrt5-1)/4 and cos⁡(4π/5)=−(5+1)/4\cos(4\pi/5)=-(\sqrt5+1)/4 give the m=1m=1 row. At q=0q=0, the two negative and two positive contributions cancel at every remaining site. The momentum-zero final state exists and satisfies the selection rule, yet its transition amplitude is zero.

The one-magnon energies are Ek=J(1−cos⁡k)E_k=J(1-\cos k). They identify possible energy differences, but do not supply the table’s weights or signs. In particular, replacing qq by −q-q preserves energy and weight while reversing the selected momentum. The independent exercise makes that convention check explicit.

These weights are transition strengths, not a probability distribution over the five different operators Oq+O_q^+. There is no requirement that their sum be one. For a fixed nonzero output, normalizing Oq+∣Ψ⟩O_q^+|\Psi\rangle produces a final state; at q=0q=0 the output is zero and cannot be normalized.

The discrete Fourier identity

15∑m=04eiqm(x−y)=δxy(x,y=1,…,5)\frac15\sum_{m=0}^{4}e^{iq_m(x-y)}=\delta_{xy} \qquad (x,y=1,\ldots,5)

proves that the five Fourier vectors form a complete orthonormal basis of the one-magnon sector. If Π1\Pi_1 projects onto that sector, then

∑k∣k⟩⟨k∣=Π1,∑k∣⟨k∣Oq+∣Ψ⟩∣2=∥Oq+∣Ψ⟩∥2.\sum_k|k\rangle\langle k|=\Pi_1, \qquad \sum_k|\langle k|O_q^+|\Psi\rangle|^2 =\|O_q^+|\Psi\rangle\|^2.

The last equality holds because the output belongs to that sector. It requires no claim about completeness of arbitrary Bethe roots in other sectors.

There is also a sum over operators. Using the same Fourier identity,

∑q(Oq+)†Oq+=∑xSx−Sx+=∑x(12−Sxz).\begin{aligned} \sum_q(O_q^+)^\dagger O_q^+ &=\sum_x S_x^-S_x^+\\ &=\sum_x\left(\frac12-S_x^z\right). \end{aligned}

The final expression counts down spins. Since the initial state has exactly two,

∑q∥Oq+∣Ψ⟩∥2=0+4(12)=2.\sum_q\|O_q^+|\Psi\rangle\|^2 =0+4\left(\frac12\right)=2.

For a fixed site yy, translation invariance gives the related local check

∥Sy+∣Ψ⟩∥2=⟨12−Syz⟩=25.\|S_y^+|\Psi\rangle\|^2 =\left\langle\frac12-S_y^z\right\rangle =\frac25.

Directly, precisely four of the ten pairs contain yy; their surviving amplitudes each have squared modulus 1/101/10.

Normalized matrix elements and a complete intermediate-state sum are the ingredients of the spectral framework in Caux 2009, § II, printed pp. 3–4, equations (1)–(3), PDF. That source defines a ground-state correlation and uses an unnormalized spatial Fourier operator. Here the initial state is an excited eigenstate and the operator includes 1/51/\sqrt5; our finite spin calculation establishes the corresponding weights directly. The next lesson, Build a spectral correlation sum, uses them to determine time dependence and frequency signs.

Guided practice: change a raw vector’s scale

Section titled “Guided practice: change a raw vector’s scale”

Replace ∣Φ⟩|\Phi\rangle by ∣Φ′⟩=(3+4i)∣Φ⟩|\Phi'\rangle=(3+4i)|\Phi\rangle, keeping final states and operators fixed. Find its norm, normalized state and matrix elements. Then calculate the total strength one would incorrectly obtain by using the original unnormalized ∣Φ⟩|\Phi\rangle in place of ∣Ψ⟩|\Psi\rangle.

Hint

A complex scalar changes a norm by its modulus. Its remaining phase changes amplitudes, but cancels from squared moduli.

Solution

Since ∣3+4i∣=5|3+4i|=5,

∥Φ′∥=5108,∣Ψ′⟩=3+4i5∣Ψ⟩.\|\Phi'\|=\frac{5\sqrt{10}}8,\qquad |\Psi'\rangle=\frac{3+4i}{5}|\Psi\rangle.

Every amplitude becomes Mq′=(3+4i)Mq/5M_q'=(3+4i)M_q/5, while every weight stays the same. Using the original raw state instead multiplies each correct weight by ∥Φ∥2=5/32\|\Phi\|^2=5/32. The resulting incorrect total is (5/32)×2=5/16(5/32)\times2=5/16. An energy eigenvalue check would still pass.

Independent practice: reverse the Fourier sign

Section titled “Independent practice: reverse the Fourier sign”

Define O‾q+=5−1/2∑xe+iqxSx+\overline O_q^+=5^{-1/2}\sum_x e^{+iqx}S_x^+. Determine its translation phase and selected final momentum. At q=2π/5q=2\pi/5, compare the actual output with an erroneous prediction that still selects ∣−q⟩|-q\rangle. Can the energy and output norm distinguish them?

Hint

Relabel the operator sum under UU. The cosine coefficient is even in qq, but ∣q⟩|q\rangle and ∣−q⟩|-q\rangle are distinct orthogonal Fourier states for this momentum.

Solution

Now UO‾q+U−1=e−iqO‾q+U\overline O_q^+U^{-1}=e^{-iq}\overline O_q^+. Therefore

O‾q+∣Ψ⟩=Mq∣q⟩,⟨−q∣O‾q+∣Ψ⟩=0(q=2π/5).\overline O_q^+|\Psi\rangle=M_q|q\rangle, \qquad \langle-q|\overline O_q^+|\Psi\rangle=0 \quad(q=2\pi/5).

The actual coefficient of ∣q⟩|q\rangle is −1/2-1/\sqrt2. Predicting the same coefficient of ∣−q⟩|-q\rangle would give the same norm and energy because Eq=E−qE_q=E_{-q}. The active translation phases are instead e−iqe^{-iq} and e+iqe^{+iq}, which differ. Testing translation, or projecting onto the full Fourier basis, detects the error that energy alone misses.

Transfer: change the operator’s spin selection

Section titled “Transfer: change the operator’s spin selection”

Replace Oq+O_q^+ by the uniform longitudinal operator

Z0=15∑xSxz=Stotz5.Z_0=\frac1{\sqrt5}\sum_x S_x^z =\frac{S^z_{\rm tot}}{\sqrt5}.

Find Z0∣Ψ⟩Z_0|\Psi\rangle and its squared norm. If every one-magnon matrix element vanishes, does that imply the output is zero? Identify exactly which completeness step must change.

Hint

The initial state’s total spin component is 1/21/2. A longitudinal operator preserves the number of down spins.

Solution

The output is

Z0∣Ψ⟩=125∣Ψ⟩,∥Z0∣Ψ⟩∥2=120.Z_0|\Psi\rangle=\frac1{2\sqrt5}|\Psi\rangle, \qquad \|Z_0|\Psi\rangle\|^2=\frac1{20}.

It remains in the two-magnon sector. Every one-magnon overlap vanishes by orthogonality of sectors, so summing those overlaps computes ∥Π1Z0∣Ψ⟩∥2=0\|\Pi_1 Z_0|\Psi\rangle\|^2=0, not the full output norm. A resolution of the identity in the correct sector recovers 1/201/20. In this special example the output is already parallel to ∣Ψ⟩|\Psi\rangle, so that single projection exhausts its weight; it does not make one vector a complete basis of the ten-dimensional sector.

  • Caux, Jean-Sébastien. “Correlation functions of integrable models: a description of the ABACUS algorithm.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 50, 095214 (2009). DOI: 10.1063/1.3216474. Author version arXiv:0908.1660v1, 12 August 2009; open PDF. Section II, printed pp. 3–4, equations (1)–(3), supports the matrix-element and spectral-sum method. The explicit five-site excited-state amplitudes are derived here.