Normalize states & calculate a matrix element
Knowing an eigenstate’s energy does not tell us how strongly an operator connects it to another state. That strength depends on normalized vectors and their matrix element. Here a regular five-site Bethe state gives an exact example: four nonzero momentum transfers have equal strength, while the zero-momentum transition vanishes. You will derive the state, calculate the amplitudes, and check their sum against a local spin identity. Everything takes place in a finite periodic chain.
Required background. Construct Bethe vectors algebraically supplies the regular creation-block state and its monodromy convention. You need complex inner products, orthonormal spin configurations and spin-raising operators. Helpful background. The linear-algebra bridge reviews normalization and complete bases; one-magnon waves explains the Fourier eigenstates used below.
A regular five-site state
Section titled “A regular five-site state”Use the spin- XXX ring with , , , unit lattice spacing and
Here , , and exchanges two spins. In the orthonormal configuration basis,
where is all up. The active right translation sends each site to its successor: , with cyclic labels.
Keep the creation block of
The regular two-root exercise establishes that
is a nonzero eigenvector. These are creation parameters ; the coordinate convention has . The set is unchanged by that sign reversal, so this particular root set cannot diagnose a momentum-convention error by itself.
Entry check: a vector is not yet normalized
Section titled “Entry check: a vector is not yet normalized”
Suppose an operator calculation produces , where is normalized but the norm of has not been calculated. Can its squared modulus already be used as the normalized transition strength? Would knowing its energy settle the question?
Check and repair
No. Calculate and divide the amplitude by it, or divide the squared modulus by . An eigenvalue equation cannot detect this missing factor: rescaling an eigenvector leaves its energy unchanged. Review inner products and normalization if this distinction is unfamiliar.
For any nonzero raw initial and final vectors, the normalized matrix element is
Replacing normalized states by and multiplies by . Its weight is unchanged. A matrix element retains phase information; a weight does not.
Calculate the state and its norm
Section titled “Calculate the state and its norm”Separate the ten unordered pairs into the five cyclic neighbors and the other five pairs:
The exact vector is
In particular, sites and are adjacent. Treating them as endpoints of an open chain would change the vector’s interpretation and its Hamiltonian check.
Derive the raw amplitudes from the creation block
The one-block formula is
At , the coefficients in site order are
Multiplying the local blocks for gives these entries:
| Input site | Coefficient in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
The columns for either target vanish on inputs . To see the sign of the less immediate entry, put . An input down spin at site becomes the pair through three auxiliary spin exchanges. Their factor is , followed by two diagonal factors , giving .
Taking the indicated products gives
The regular Bethe calculation gives . The translation orbits of and exhaust the ten configurations, so these two components determine the whole vector. The displayed vector also verifies that translation property directly.
The configuration states are orthonormal, hence
We choose the normalized state
This fixes a global phase by making every adjacent-pair amplitude negative real. Other phase choices describe the same physical state.
There is a short Hamiltonian check independent of rapidity formulas. Write and . Each adjacent configuration has two unequal bonds; each nonadjacent configuration has four. Applying the bond exchanges and collecting equal configurations gives
Therefore
The state has coordinate momentum modulo and total spin component .
Spin and momentum select the final state
Section titled “Spin and momentum select the final state”For the five allowed momenta, define
Our spin operators and their matrix elements are dimensionless with . The Fourier factor is part of the operator definition; changing it changes every weight.
Since , this operator turns the two-down-spin state into the one-down-spin sector. A normalized basis of that final sector is
The positive exponent in the state and the negative exponent in the operator are deliberate. Active translation gives
Relabeling the finite sum, with at the seam, yields
Thus an initial state with eigenvalue can have a nonzero matrix element only to a state with
Here , so the only possible final Fourier state is . This is a necessary selection rule. It does not guarantee a nonzero amplitude.
Calculate the amplitude
Section titled “Calculate the amplitude”After a raising operator removes one down spin, the remaining down spin can be at any site . The removed spin was at either or . The former pairs have negative amplitudes; the latter have positive amplitudes. Consequently,
Cyclic site labels are legitimate because is an allowed ring momentum. Comparing with the normalized Fourier vector gives the entire output:
The fixed state phases make these amplitudes real:
| Momentum label | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
For example, and give the row. At , the two negative and two positive contributions cancel at every remaining site. The momentum-zero final state exists and satisfies the selection rule, yet its transition amplitude is zero.
The one-magnon energies are . They identify possible energy differences, but do not supply the table’s weights or signs. In particular, replacing by preserves energy and weight while reversing the selected momentum. The independent exercise makes that convention check explicit.
These weights are transition strengths, not a probability distribution over the five different operators . There is no requirement that their sum be one. For a fixed nonzero output, normalizing produces a final state; at the output is zero and cannot be normalized.
Check completeness and the total strength
Section titled “Check completeness and the total strength”The discrete Fourier identity
proves that the five Fourier vectors form a complete orthonormal basis of the one-magnon sector. If projects onto that sector, then
The last equality holds because the output belongs to that sector. It requires no claim about completeness of arbitrary Bethe roots in other sectors.
There is also a sum over operators. Using the same Fourier identity,
The final expression counts down spins. Since the initial state has exactly two,
For a fixed site , translation invariance gives the related local check
Directly, precisely four of the ten pairs contain ; their surviving amplitudes each have squared modulus .
Normalized matrix elements and a complete intermediate-state sum are the ingredients of the spectral framework in Caux 2009, § II, printed pp. 3–4, equations (1)–(3), PDF. That source defines a ground-state correlation and uses an unnormalized spatial Fourier operator. Here the initial state is an excited eigenstate and the operator includes ; our finite spin calculation establishes the corresponding weights directly. The next lesson, Build a spectral correlation sum, uses them to determine time dependence and frequency signs.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Guided practice: change a raw vector’s scale
Section titled “Guided practice: change a raw vector’s scale”
Replace by , keeping final states and operators fixed. Find its norm, normalized state and matrix elements. Then calculate the total strength one would incorrectly obtain by using the original unnormalized in place of .
Hint
A complex scalar changes a norm by its modulus. Its remaining phase changes amplitudes, but cancels from squared moduli.
Solution
Since ,
Every amplitude becomes , while every weight stays the same. Using the original raw state instead multiplies each correct weight by . The resulting incorrect total is . An energy eigenvalue check would still pass.
Independent practice: reverse the Fourier sign
Section titled “Independent practice: reverse the Fourier sign”
Define . Determine its translation phase and selected final momentum. At , compare the actual output with an erroneous prediction that still selects . Can the energy and output norm distinguish them?
Hint
Relabel the operator sum under . The cosine coefficient is even in , but and are distinct orthogonal Fourier states for this momentum.
Solution
Now . Therefore
The actual coefficient of is . Predicting the same coefficient of would give the same norm and energy because . The active translation phases are instead and , which differ. Testing translation, or projecting onto the full Fourier basis, detects the error that energy alone misses.
Transfer: change the operator’s spin selection
Section titled “Transfer: change the operator’s spin selection”
Replace by the uniform longitudinal operator
Find and its squared norm. If every one-magnon matrix element vanishes, does that imply the output is zero? Identify exactly which completeness step must change.
Hint
The initial state’s total spin component is . A longitudinal operator preserves the number of down spins.
Solution
The output is
It remains in the two-magnon sector. Every one-magnon overlap vanishes by orthogonality of sectors, so summing those overlaps computes , not the full output norm. A resolution of the identity in the correct sector recovers . In this special example the output is already parallel to , so that single projection exhausts its weight; it does not make one vector a complete basis of the ten-dimensional sector.
References
Section titled “References”- Caux, Jean-Sébastien. “Correlation functions of integrable models: a description of the ABACUS algorithm.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 50, 095214 (2009). DOI: 10.1063/1.3216474. Author version arXiv:0908.1660v1, 12 August 2009; open PDF. Section II, printed pp. 3–4, equations (1)–(3), supports the matrix-element and spectral-sum method. The explicit five-site excited-state amplitudes are derived here.